Pertimbangan Biaya dalam Pemilihan Bekisting

Mohammad Arif Bahtiar Efendi, Rendi Gusta Wibowo

Abstract


Abstract— Materials in the construction world is progressing quite rapidly. Likewise formwork as a project is also experiencing quite rapid progress which refers to the value of the results of a project. In a project the determination of the type of system and formwork method will affect the cost and time in progress, the selection of the formwork method which is not appropriate will have a loss in the future. The analysis conducted is comparing formwork of semi-conventional methods and system (PERI) in column, beam and plate formworks of the INKA Graha Building Construction Project, Madiun. The objective to be achieved in this paper is to find out the type of formwork that is efficient to be used in a formwork work both for beam and plate columns, in terms of cost comparisons and finding a draw point between the two methods.

After analyzing it is known that the use of semi-conventional initiating systems is more efficient with a value of Rp. 2,349,756,391, - and for the PERI system costs Rp. 3,050,649,782, - .. The draw point of this system is in the volume of 31,500 m2 which means that in this volume the use of semi-conventional systems and PERI systems does not differ in terms of cost.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amri, Sjafei, 2005, “Teknologi Beton A-Z”, Jakarta : Yayasan John Hi-Tech Idetama

Arikunto,S, 1993, “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik”, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Blake, L.S. 1975, “Civil Engineer’s Referennce Book”, London : The Butterwth & Co. Ltd.

Callahan, 1992, “Construction Project Schedulling.” Singapore: McGraw Hill.

Clark, J. E., 1983, “Structural Concrete Cost Estimating.” New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Diphohusodo, 1994, “Struktur Beton Bertulang”, Jakarta : Gramedia.

Handbook Formwork, 2005, “Successful Construction with PERI.” PERI. Hanna, A. S., (1999), “Concrete Formwork System.” University of Wisconsin : Marcel Dekker,inc.

Hidayat, I., 2002, “Perbandingan Perfoma antara Bekisting Beton Sistem Konvensional dengan Bekisting Beton Sistem PERI”. Skripsi, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Illingworth, J. R., 1993, “Construction Method and Planning.” London: E & FN Spon.

Mardal, M.,2008, “Optimalisasi Waktu dan Biaya Pekerjaan Bekisting untuk Gedung Bertingkat dengan Sistem Zoning (Studi Kasus: Proyek Shangri-la Hotel Condominium Jakarta.” Skripsi, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Nofirman, A., 2006, “Perbandingan Efisiensi, Efektifitas dan Ekonomis Metode Bekisting antara Sistem Konvensional dengan Sistem PERI.” Skripsi, FT Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta.

PKKI 1961 “Peraturan Konstruksi Kayu Indonesia NI-5”. Badan Standarisasi Nasional

Setiaty, W., 2005, “Perbandingan Perancah Bekisting Box Girder antara Sistem PERI dengan Sistem Ring Scaffold Ditinjau dari Segi Biaya dan Waktu.” Skripsi, FT Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta.

Stephens, 1985 “Pengertian Bekisting” http:/e-journal.uajy.ac.id.

Suripto, 2000,”Petunjuk Praktek Kerja Acuan dan Perancah I”. Depok: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta.

Yusron A., 2010, “Optimalisasi Waktu dan Biaya Pekerjaan Bekisting melalui sistem siklus pemakaian dan sistem zoning pada gedung bertingkat (Studi Kasus Proyek universitas gadjah mada kampus jakarta).” Skripsi, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Wigbout, Ing. 1987, “Bekisting (Kotak Cetak)”. Jakarta : Erlangga.

www.peri.com




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/piltek.v6i2.101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed By :

 

Publisher :

LPPM Universitas Merdeka Madiun
Website: http://unmermadiun.ac.id
Email: lppm@unmer-madiun.ac.id / pilarteknologi@unmer-madiun.ac.id  
© Copyright 2021 PILAR TEKNOLOGI : Jurnal Teknik (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik)
ISSN 2580-3557 (Online)